Cost and capability
The comparison we’ve put together is based on whether it’s possible (and how much it costs) to do in Outreach what you can do in Close.
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Is Close a good alternative to Outreach?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "For small and mid-sized outbound teams, often yes. Outreach is built for enterprise sales orgs (100+ reps) running complex, multi-touch sequences at scale, typically with a dedicated admin. Close is built for lean teams that want calling, email, and SMS in one CRM without that overhead." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How does Close pricing compare to Outreach?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Close publishes transparent pricing from $9 to $139 per user/month with no onboarding fee. Outreach uses custom, quote-based pricing tied to team size, usage, and AI credit volume, with no public rate card \u2014 a sales call is required to get a number." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "When does it make sense to stay on Outreach instead of switching to Close?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Large sales organizations with a dedicated RevOps team running highly complex, multi-stage sequencing at scale are usually better served by Outreach\u2019s enterprise feature set. Close fits teams that want strong outbound execution without the enterprise implementation." } } ] }
Exactly. Neither have we. So when we set about comparing our CRM to others we wanted to take a different approach.
The comparison we’ve put together is based on whether it’s possible (and how much it costs) to do in Outreach what you can do in Close.
For some of you, Outreach will be the better option. What we’re trying to demonstrate is when Close is a better fit than our competitor.
Outreach and Close are often compared, but the two products are designed to service drastically different types of businesses. Outreach is more focused on enterprise-level sales reporting and insights in addition to CRM features, but will require paid consulting and dedicated team members to manage the CRM itself. Close is better suited for small and medium businesses with its more powerful calling features and outreach. A sales leader can implement Close quickly and easily for a much faster velocity to product use.
Outreach is built more specifically on machine learning and its features lean more toward business insights and intelligence vs. Close’s sales efficiency software goals of improving your team’s daily performance. Outreach also has a core focus on recruiting efforts, which is not a solution area that Close serves.
Outreach is a great, modern CRM, but a lot of the critical functionality required by a high-performing sales team is highly dependent on expensive third party applications.
There are also some key sales functions that, even with a third-party app, you just cannot perform using Outreach (such as call coaching, VoIP, and power dialing). With Close, they’re all built-in.
Close is a CRM built to double your sales team’s productivity.
It’s an “all in one” platform which you can use standalone without needing any other sales emails tools or calling products.
It has been built with scalability in mind and can handle a high volume of leads.
Outreach is good if you’re an enterprise level sales team looking for CRM and heavy reporting/AI insights combined into one platform.
Outreach also tends to work best if you have resources dedicated to scaling your CRM and managing third-party applications.
I have tried: Five9, MOJO, PhoneBurner, Zoho, Freshdesk, and the list goes on. You can finish implementing Close CRM for your business before you finish your morning cup of coffee. For the sales gurus that want to provide an impact to their bottom line, while not over spending, Close is the solution.

.png)
.png)
.png)